The simple, uneducated dialogue Steinbeck employs also helps to create a more honest and meaningful representation of the migrants, and it makes the migrants more relatable to readers. Steinbeck chooses to accurately represent the language of the migrants in order to more clearly illustrate their lives and make them seem more like real paper than just characters in a book. There are multiple grammatical errors in that single sentence, but it vividly conveys the despair the migrants felt better than a technically perfect sentence would.
The Grapes of Wrath is intended to show the severe difficulties facing the migrants so Steinbeck employs a clear, pragmatic style of writing. The depiction of the migrants as imperfect through their language also makes them easier to relate to. Repeatedly in The Grapes of Wrath , the wealthy make it obvious that they scorn the plight of the migrants. The wealthy, not bad luck or natural disasters, were the prominent cause of the suffering of migrant families such as the Joads.
Thus, Steinbeck turns to the less prosperous for support in his novel. In The Grapes of Wrath , John Steinbeck uses metaphors, particularly about nature, in order to illustrate the mood and the overall plight of migrants. Throughout most of the book, the land is described as dusty, barren, and dead.
Towards the end, however; floods come and the landscape begins to change. This description offers a stark contrast from the earlier passages which were filled with despair and destruction. However, at the end of the chapter the rain has caused new life to grow in California. The new grass becomes a metaphor representing hope. When the migrants are at a loss over how they will survive the winter, the grass offers reassurance.
The story of the migrants in the intercalary chapters parallels that of the Joads. At the end of the novel, the family is breaking apart and has been forced to flee their home. However, both the book and final intercalary chapter end on a hopeful note after so much suffering has occurred. Steinbeck affirms that persistence, even when problems appear insurmountable, leads to success. Refraining from using specific names and terms allows Steinbeck to show that many thousands of migrants suffered through the same wrongs.
When Steinbeck writes in the imperfect dialogue of the migrants, he creates a more accurate portrayal and makes the migrants easier to relate to for a less affluent audience. Metaphors, particularly relating to nature, strengthen the themes in The Grapes of Wrath by enhancing the mood Steinbeck wants readers to feel at different points in the book. Overall, the intercalary chapters that Steinbeck includes improve his novel by making it more memorable and reinforcing the themes Steinbeck embraces throughout the novel.
Steinbeck wrote The Grapes of Wrath to bring to light cruelties against migrants, and by using literary devices effectively, he continuously reminds readers of his purpose. This essay sticks pretty closely to the standard analytical essay outline. It starts with an introduction, where I chose to use a quote to start off the essay.
I then give a bit of background on The Grapes of Wrath and its themes before ending the intro paragraph with my thesis: that Steinbeck used literary devices in intercalary chapters to show how rough migrants had it.
What does this analytical essay example do well? For starters, it contains everything that a strong analytical essay should, and it makes that easy to find. Additionally, the essay does a good job of taking an in-depth look at the issue introduced in the thesis. Four ways Steinbeck used literary devices are discussed, and for each of the examples are given and analysis is provided so readers can understand why Steinbeck included those devices and how they helped shaped how readers viewed migrants and their plight.
Where could this essay be improved? I believe the weakest body paragraph is the third one, the one that discusses how Steinbeck used plain, grammatically incorrect language to both accurately depict the migrants and make them more relatable to readers.
The easiest way is to search on the web for the information. Brainstorm ideas. Make a list of topics for your analysis essay, and then choose the best one. Generate your thesis statement in the same way. Prepare an outline. Below you will find more detailed information on how your paper should be structured.
Write the first draft. Your next goal is to write the first version of your analysis essay, using all the notes that you have. Polish your draft. Define the main goal s of your analysis. Remember that it is impossible to address each and every aspect in a single paper. Know your goal and focus on it. Conduct research , both online and offline, to clarify the issue contained within your thesis statement.
Identify the main parts of the issue by looking at each part separately to see how it works. Identify the links between the various aspects of the topic. By using the information you found, try to solve your main problem. Give background information that would help the reader understand your opinion. Formulate a thesis statement informing the reader about the purpose of the essay. Essay format does not presuppose telling everything possible on the given topic.
Thus, a thesis statement tells what you are going to say, implying what you will not discuss, establishing the limits. Continue with textual evidence paraphrase, summary, direct quotations, specific details. Use several examples that substantiate the topic sentence.
Provide an adequate explanation of the content of the essay in just a few carefully chosen words. Provide a lead-in for the reader by offering a general introduction to the topic of the paper. Include your thesis statement , which shifts the reader from the generalized introduction to the specific topic and its related issues to your unique take on the essay topic.
Discuss one argument per paragraph , although each argument can relate to multiple issues. Strike a balance between writing in an unbiased tone, while expressing your personal opinion. Be reasonable when making judgments regarding any of the problems you discuss. Remember to include the opposing point of view to create a balanced perspective. Choose the main sentence. The main or topic sentence will be the first line in your essay. The topic sentence is responsible for presenting the argument you will discuss in the paragraph and demonstrate how this argument relates to the thesis statement.
Provide the context for the topic sentence , whether it relates to a quote, a specific incident in society, or something else. Offer evidence on who, what, where, when, why, and how. Give your analysis of the argument and how it adequately proves your thesis. Write a closing sentence that sums up the paragraph and provides a transition to the following paragraph. Repeat the thesis statement and summarize your argument. Even when using the best summary generator for the task, reread it to make sure all the crucial points are included.
Take your argument beyond what is simply stated in your paper. You want to show how it is essential in terms of the bigger picture. Also, you may dwell on the influence on citizens of the country.
Now you are ready to write an analysis essay! It is not necessary to imitate the chronology of the literary work you are analyzing. Remember you need to incorporate at least one academic non-fictional source to develop your argument. Check our website for more information about what counts as an academic source. If you see too much yellow in your paper, chances are your voice and ideas have not been fully develop.
Quote only passages that would lose their effectiveness if they were paraphrased. Some patrolmen were parked near campus gates, while others, with guns strapped to their sides, stood near building entrances.
Though many of my escorts had given me smiles of support, still I was not prepared for what I encountered upon entering my new school. This is a paragraph from a process analysis.
The author, Joyce M. Jaret, has beautifully described her experience of the security in this paragraph, and how it is deployed when an important figure faces security issues in his life. This is an analysis of the process of security deployment. Like the synthesis in Hegelian philosophy, the principle of nonviolent resistance seeks to reconcile the truths of two opposites—the acquiescence and violence—while avoiding the extremes and immoralities of both.
0コメント